CRI

 [ABSTRACT]

This report explores housing policy directions based on the concept of Aging in Community (AIC) to prepare for a super-aged society. It identifies current issues such as the high cost and limited service scope of existing senior housing models, the lack of mid-level housing options for healthy older adults, and the need for living environments that support both independence and community ties. The study emphasizes the importance of enabling seniors to remain in familiar living environments while maintaining social connections and receiving integrated support.

The theoretical framework highlights four core principles of AIC: residential stability, autonomy and self-determination, community-based participation, and integrated access to services. AIC expands the idea of housing beyond the physical unit to encompass the broader community network. Key elements include technology-enabled independent living, opportunities for local engagement, and strengthened informal support networks. Case studies from Singapore (Kampung Admiralty), Japan (Toyoshikidai Project), the United States (Mirabella at ASU), and Korea (Haesimdang, among others) demonstrate various models of senior housing. These examples show the potential of vertically integrated multi-functional communities that combine residential units with medical, caregiving, commercial, and 

community facilities. They also illustrate design strategies that promote intergenerational interaction, community openness, and senior employment opportunities. Survey findings indicate that residents show the strongest demand for health and This report explores housing policy directions based on the concept of Aging in Community (AIC) to prepare for a super-aged society. It identifies current issues such as the high cost and limited service scope of existing senior housing models, the lack of mid-level housing options for healthy older adults, and the need for living environments that support both independence and community ties. The study emphasizes the importance of enabling seniors to remain in familiar living environments while maintaining social connections and receiving integrated 

support. The theoretical framework highlights four core principles of AIC: residential stability, autonomy and self-determination, community-based participation, and integrated access to services. AIC expands the idea of housing beyond the physical unit to encompass the broader community network. Key elements include technology-enabled independent living, opportunities for local engagement, and strengthened informal support networks. Case studies from Singapore (Kampung Admiralty), Japan (Toyoshikidai Project), the United States (Mirabella at ASU), and Korea (Haesimdang, among others) demonstrate various models of senior housing. These examples show the potential of vertically integrated multi-functional communities that combine residential units with medical, caregiving, commercial, and community facilities. They also illustrate design strategies that promote intergenerational interaction, community openness, and senior employment opportunities.

Survey findings indicate that residents show the strongest demand for health and environmental programs (33%) and safety/security programs (23.5%). More than 70% of respondents agreed that intergenerational programs contribute to personal development and social skills. Preferences vary by age group: those in their 60s favor health-focused activities, while younger adults prefer education, childcare, and safety programs. The policy recommendations include: establishing a new classification system for senior housing based on health status and existing living environments; expanding private-sector participation and providing tax and financial incentives; streamlining permitting processes; and 

introducing stable financial support models to manage housing and service costs. Building an 

integrated system that combines housing, care, and health services is emphasized as essential, 

along with activating local communities, addressing care gaps, implementing smart-home technologies, and supporting independent living. Ultimately, the report argues that a sustainable housing ecosystem is needed—one in which older adults can live with dignity and independence within their communities, supported by strong intergenerational and local connections. It proposes a new policy paradigm grounded in collaboration among national and local governments, communities, and the private sector.