자체계획에 의하여 수행, 지역정책 수립을 위한 기초 연구과제입니다. 게시물 검색 등록일순 조회수순 제목연구진 검색 총 4건의 게시물이 있습니다. 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1995 게시물 목록 충청북도 자활근로사업의 발전 방안 관련키워드 충청북도자활근로사업발전방안 연구진 : 최승호 발행일 : 2007. 12 조회수 : 8,604 목차 이 글은 충북지역 12개 시?군의 자활근로사업을 조사 대상으로 하면서, 동시에 전국적인 현황을 비교해 보고 현재 자활사업 개선을 위한 법률개정 내용을 소개하고 분석해 보았다. 지역적인 여건과 특성을 고려하여 지역 자활의 문제점을 파악하기 위해 지역 자활후견기관장과 실무자와 심층면접을 가졌다. 또한 저소득층 사회적 일자리 사업으로 실시되고 있는 가사?간병 도우미 사업, 바우처 사업, 사회적 기업 육성법 등의 전개와 내용을 살펴보았다. 실질적으로 자활을 위해 지역 차원에서 제도적, 정책적으로 개선, 지원해야 할 것들이 무엇이 있는지를 고려하기 위해 현재 자활전달체계로써 자활협의체와 경기도, 인천과 대구광역시에 설립되어 있는 광역자활지원센터의 기능을 파악하여 지역 차원의 거버넌스를 구축해 보고자 하였다. 그리하여 사회정책적 차원에서 지역의 실업예방과 빈곤 극복을 달성하기 위해서는 무엇보다 광역 차원의 전달체계와 조직이 필요하다는 정책 대안을 제시하였다. 내용은 우선 빈곤의 문제를 역사적으로 개인의 나태함이나 게으름으로 보는 시각과 사회구조적인 문제로 접근하는 시각으로 대별해 볼 수 있으나, 복지국가의 태동과 함께 빈곤문제에 대한 국가의 책임과 개입이 이루어지면서 국민 최저생계의 보장이 제도적으로 확보된다. 전후 복지국가의 황금기, 정체기 내지 전환기를 거치면서 완전고용, 소득보장을 추구하는 전통적인 복지국가는 일을 통한 복지로써 근로연계복지를 각국이 정책적으로 추구하게 된다. 그러나 근로연계복지가 단기간의 취업을 목표로 하는 노동시장의 공급측면에 맞추어져 있는지, 수요 측면의 인적자원개발을 중시하는 교육 및 직업훈련을 강조하는지에 따라 크게 미국과 유럽으로 나누어 볼 수 있다. 사회경제적인 환경의 변화에 의한 신빈곤층의 대두와 이에 대응한 한국에서의 자활사업은 조건부 수급규정에 의한 근로의욕의 고취와 복지의존을 경계하기 위한 제도이다. 근본적으로 자활제도는 노동통합적인 사회정책적인 차원이 아니라, 탈수급(탈빈곤)의 목표에 맞추어진 빈곤층의 소득보전프로그램이다. 현재 국민기초생활보장법 내의 자활 사업은 제도가 시행된 지 6년 정도 지난 시점에서 자활사업이 우선 참여대상자로부터 급여수준과 일의 만족도에서 좋은 평가를 받고 있으나, 인적자원개발이나 사업의 효과가 미미하며 개인적인 삶의 비전을 제시하지 못하고 있다는 평가를 받고 있다. 그리하여 급여와 주어진 일에 만족하다보니 자활사업에 안주하려는 경향으로 나타난다. 자활로 이끄는 경로를 제도로써 제시하지 못하고 있다는 것이 큰 문제이다. 우선 제도 내적으로 근로 유인 효과를 이끌어 낼 수 있는 근로인센티브 제도가 없는 보충급여 방식, 전담 공무원 부재, 근로 미약자가 다수인 대상자 선정 기준, 5대 표준화에 국한된 사업종류의 한계, 재취업전환 프로그램 등 자영업자 특화 훈련프로그램 개발 부재, 취업알선, 직업훈련, 창업지원을 담당하는 지원 인프라 조직이 없는 것 등을 들 수 있다. 자활지원 사업은 노동시장정책 및 일자리 창출 정책과의 관계, 지역사회에 필요한 사회적 서비스의 확대, 제반 사회복지서비스와의 관계, 낙후 지역개발 등을 고려하여 종합자활지원정책이 수립되어야 한다. 자활이 지역경제의 활성화와 지역공동체의 강화를 기반으로 하고 있기 때문에 중앙 관 주도로 일률적, 수직적으로 전달되는 사업은 효과면에서 한계가 있다. 충북지역 12개 시?군의 자활근로사업의 어려움을 들자면, 지역적인 특성상 농촌 군 지역이 많은 관계로 고연령층의 노인 참여자가 많다는 것, 그로 인해 사업성과에 한계가 있음에도 전국적인 후견기관 평가는 타 시도의 기관에 비해 불리할 수밖에 없다는 것, 후견기관 종사자 처우문제의 어려움, 광역차원의 지원센터의 필요성, 지자체(장)의 지원미비 등에 대해 실무자들은 토로하였다. 광역차원에서의 정책적 대안은 결국 지역차원의 거버넌스를 위한 자활전달체계로써 자활협의체의 활성화, 광역자활지원의 인프라 확보, 이를 뛰어넘어 현재 정부에서 경쟁적으로 실시하고 있는 저소득층 사회적 일자리 사업인 가사?간병 도우미 사업, 바우처 사업, 사회적 기업 육성법 등의 전개에 상응하여 빈곤층 자활사업뿐만 아니라, 저소득층 사회적 일자리 사업까지 포괄하면서 일자리 창출, 인적자원개발, 지역 특성을 고려한 신규 일자리 사업발굴과 홍보 등의 내용까지 포괄하는 광역사회서비스센터의 설립을 대안으로 제시하였다. 이는 사회 정책적 차원에서 지역의 실업예방과 빈곤 극복을 달성하기 위한 전달체계와 조직일 것이며, 자활근로, 사회적 일자리, 사회서비스 일자리 사업 등을 조정, 연계, 통합, 지원하는 역할을 할 수 있을 것이다 * 자세한 연구요약과 목차는 업데이트 예정 다운로드 충북 농축산물 수출업체에 대한 실태조사 = A Survey on Export Company of Aagric… 관련키워드 충북농축산물수출업체대한실태조사=ASurveyonExportCompanyofAagric… 연구진 : 우장명,박종은,윤영한,김병훈 발행일 : 2008. 12 조회수 : 8,580 목차 [연구개요] 충북의 농축산물을 수출하는 업체 현황과 지원 실태를 조사하여 농축산물 수출의 촉진과 확대를 위한 방안을 제시하는데 목적을 두었다. [연구내용 요약] 충청북도에 소재한 농축산물 수출 업체들은 대체로 최근에 설립된 회사들이 많았으며, 매출액은 1~50억원, 그리고 종업원 수는 1~20명이 대부분이었다. 주요 수출품은 대부분 농산가공품이며 품목별로는 고춧가루가 가장 많았다. 수출액은 1000만달러 이하가 대부분이며 직접수출이 많았다. 2008년 수출 여건을 전년과 비교하였을 때 다소 호전되었다고 느끼는 업체들이 많았는데, 마케팅 활동 강화에 의한 것이라고 하였다. 한편 수출이 악화되었다고 느끼는 업체들은 원료 가격 상승을 그 이유로 제시하였다. 수출할 때 최대 애로사항은 신규 바이어 발굴이라고 하였다.수출 방식은 직수출, 직수출+로컬수출이 가장 많았는데 로컬수출만 하는 경우에도 해외거래처만 확보된다면 직수출을 하겠다는 응답이 많았다. 신규 바이어를 확보할 수만 있다면 직수출의 비율이 더욱 높아질 것으로 예상된다. 농축산물의 주요 수출국은 미국, 일본, 동남아, 중국의 순이었으며, 바이어는 현지인과 해외동포가 비슷한 비중을 차지하고 있다. 향후 농축산물 수출에 있어서 주요 경쟁국은 중국을 가장 많이 뽑았다. [정책건의] 농축산물 수출에는 국내 수급 상황, 농업생산비, 운송 및 저장 등 물류시스템, 환율 변화 수출통관 절차, 해외마케팅 등 여러 단계에서 애로요인이 많으므로 단계별로 지원방안을 수립할 필요가 있다. 다운로드 [2022-10] 충북 내수 중소제조기업 수출기업화 방안 관련키워드 [2022-10]충북내수중소제조기업수출기업화방안 연구진 : 윤영한 발행일 : 2022.12. 조회수 : 1,962 목차 제Ⅰ장 서론 ······················································································11. 연구 배경 및 목적 ·····················································································12. 연구 범위 및 방법 ·····················································································4제Ⅱ장 선행연구 및 관련 동향 분석 ·····················································61. 선행연구 ······································································································62. 중소기업 관련 동향 ··················································································103. 주요국 관련 정책 분석 ············································································11 1) 미국 ·······································································································11 2) EU ········································································································15 3) 독일 ·······································································································17 4) 일본 ·······································································································18 5) 중국 ·······································································································20 6) 러시아 ···································································································24 7) 시사점 ···································································································264. 국내 관련 정책 분석 ················································································29 1) 연혁 ·······································································································29 2) 주요 정책 ······························································································30 3) 충청북도 관련 정책 ··············································································39 4) 시사점 ···································································································45제Ⅲ장 충북 현황 분석 ········································································481. 도내 제조업 동향 ·····················································································48 1) 도내 제조업체 동향 ··············································································48 2) 충북의 산업구조 ···················································································51 3) 기초 지자체별 동향 ··············································································542. 도내 무역 관련 동향 ················································································56 1) 수출입 동향 ··························································································56 2) 해외투자 ································································································653. 시사점 ·······································································································74제Ⅳ장 충북 제조업 수출기업화 관련 실태조사 ·································761. 조사개요 ····································································································762. 조사결과 분석 ···························································································80 1) 글로벌시장 진출 여부 ··········································································80 2) 해외시장 진출 계획·방법·대상국 ·························································89 3) 해외시장 진출 애로요인 ·······································································92 4) 해외시장 진출시 지원기관 및 지원제도 활용현황 ······························94 5) 글로벌 시장 진출시 지원기관 서비스 ·················································98 6) 글로벌 업무 전담인력 ········································································101 7) 글로벌 시장 진출을 위한 기술혁신 필요성 ······································105 8) 글로벌시장 진출을 위한 교육 필요성 ···············································1083. 시사점 ·····································································································115제Ⅴ장 결론: 정책적 제언 ·································································1191. 중소기업 해외진출 지원정책의 전략적 방향 ·········································1192. 중소기업 해외진출 지원정책 개선방안 ··················································121 1) 중소기업 해외진출 지원체계 개선 및 지원정책 위상 강화 ·············121 2) 수출기업의 외연 확대 ········································································122 3) 산업・기업별 지원프로그램 강화 ························································123 4) 진출 대상지역 다각화에 대응 ···························································125 5) 기타 ····································································································126참고문헌 ························································································129부록 ·······························································································134 다운로드 [2022-16] 지방자치단체의 기관구성 다양화 방안에 관한 연구 관련키워드 [2022-16]지방자치단체기관구성다양화방안관한연구 연구진 : 최용환 발행일 : 2022.12. 조회수 : 1,684 목차 제Ⅰ장 서론 ·················································································11. 연구 배경 및 목적 ·····················································································12. 연구 범위 및 방법 ·····················································································4제Ⅱ장 지방자치단체 기관구성의 다양화에 관한 논의 ·························51. 기관구성 다양화의 의의 ·············································································52. 기관구성의 다양화 논의 ···········································································103. 행정기구 조직과 운영체계에 관한 법적 근거 ·········································174. 기관구성 및 운영상의 문제점 ··································································20제Ⅲ장 외국 지방정부의 기관구성 사례분석 ······································341. 미국의 기관구성 ·······················································································342. 영국의 기관구성 ·······················································································393. 일본의 기관구성 ·······················································································434. 기관구성 사례의 시사점 ···········································································46제Ⅳ장 지방자치단체 기관구성 다양화 모델 설계 ·····························471. 기관구성 다양화의 기본방향 ····································································472. 충청북도 기관구성의 설계 방안 ······························································53제Ⅴ장 결론 ···············································································561. 결론 ···········································································································56참고문헌 ····················································································58 다운로드