지역정책연구 테스트

  1. HOME
  2. CRI 연구
  4. 지역정책연구 테스트
CRI 연구
“한국연구재단” 등재지로, 지역연구 전문 학술지로 2021년부터 년3회 발간되고 있습니다.
게시물 검색
총 5건의 게시물이 있습니다.
게시물 목록 Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 427
            [wr_num] => -427
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 427
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-1] 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안
            [wr_content] => 사회과학에서 양적 방법과 질적 방법 간의 논쟁은 역사가 오래되었다. 양적 방법과 질적 방법이 양 립불가능한 것으로 보는 견해도 있고, 양립가능한 것으로 보는 견해도 있다. 그러나 학문적 논쟁과는 별개로, 연구에 있어서는 연구자의 목적에 따라 질적 방법과 양적 방법이 다양하게 쓰이고 있으며, 혼합 연구가 유용한 연구결과들을 내놓고 있다. 혼합 방법은 ‘삼각법’이라고 불리기도 한다. 한편 현 실적으로 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가에 있어서는 양적 방법과 질적 방법을 같이 사용할 수 밖에 없다. 학술적 논쟁보다는 국제개발협력 프로젝트에 대한 정확한 평가를 위해서 필요하다. 왜냐하면 수원국에는 통계와 같은 양적자료가 충분하지도 않을 뿐만 아니라, 현장연구가 필수적이기 때문이다. 실제로 대부분의 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가는 혼합 방법에 의존한다. 그럼에도 국제개발협력 분야 에서 양적 방법, 질적 방법, 혼합 방법에 대한 고찰은 부족하다. 이 논문은 양적 방법과 질적 방법 의 비교를 위한 기본 문제를 8개의 범주로 나누어 고찰하였다. 그리고 양적 방법과 질적 방법의 양 립이 가능하다는 주장, 즉 혼합 방법의 이론적 근거, 방법, 기대 효과를 고찰하였다. 마지막으로 국 제개발협력 프로젝트 평가를 위한 혼합 방법의 적용을 7개의 범주로 나누어 고찰하였다. 무엇보다 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가에 있어서는 양적 방법과 질적 방법이 학술적 논쟁과는 별 개로 모두 사용되고 있다. 수원국(recipient country)에는 통계 등 양적 자료가 충분하지 않을 뿐더 러, 양적 자료로 측정할 수 없는 것이 많다. 또 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가는 반드시 현장연구가 수행되어야 하며, 지역연구, 인터뷰 등 질적 연구 방법이 많이 사용되고 있다. 또 평가에 다양한 학 문적 배경을 가진 연구자들이 참여하는 학제간(Interdisciplinarity) 연구가 이미 혼합 방법을 전제로 하고 있기도 하다. 
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-1-국제개발협력-프로젝트-평가에-혼합-방법-적용-방안
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2962
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:8wyGmlYT38xHs0xP3OJ1dwY/3utN9Um8:419nW8SCzkSmx81ywSlp84ZKOHngffNl
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-07-10 10:54:26
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-07-10 10:54:26
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.06.30
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-1] 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안
            [content] => 사회과학에서 양적 방법과 질적 방법 간의 논쟁은 역사가 오래되었다. 양적 방법과 질적 방법이 양 립불가능한 것으로 보는 견해도 있고, 양립가능한 것으로 보는 견해도 있다. 그러나 학문적 논쟁과는 별개로, 연구에 있어서는 연구자의 목적에 따라 질적 방법과 양적 방법이 다양하게 쓰이고 있으며, 혼합 연구가 유용한 연구결과들을 내놓고 있다. 혼합 방법은 ‘삼각법’이라고 불리기도 한다. 한편 현 실적으로 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가에 있어서는 양적 방법과 질적 방법을 같이 사용할 수 밖에 없다. 학술적 논쟁보다는 국제개발협력 프로젝트에 대한 정확한 평가를 위해서 필요하다. 왜냐하면 수원국에는 통계와 같은 양적자료가 충분하지도 않을 뿐만 아니라, 현장연구가 필수적이기 때문이다. 실제로 대부분의 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가는 혼합 방법에 의존한다. 그럼에도 국제개발협력 분야 에서 양적 방법, 질적 방법, 혼합 방법에 대한 고찰은 부족하다. 이 논문은 양적 방법과 질적 방법 의 비교를 위한 기본 문제를 8개의 범주로 나누어 고찰하였다. 그리고 양적 방법과 질적 방법의 양 립이 가능하다는 주장, 즉 혼합 방법의 이론적 근거, 방법, 기대 효과를 고찰하였다. 마지막으로 국 제개발협력 프로젝트 평가를 위한 혼합 방법의 적용을 7개의 범주로 나누어 고찰하였다. 무엇보다 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가에 있어서는 양적 방법과 질적 방법이 학술적 논쟁과는 별 개로 모두 사용되고 있다. 수원국(recipient country)에는 통계 등 양적 자료가 충분하지 않을 뿐더 러, 양적 자료로 측정할 수 없는 것이 많다. 또 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가는 반드시 현장연구가 수행되어야 하며, 지역연구, 인터뷰 등 질적 연구 방법이 많이 사용되고 있다. 또 평가에 다양한 학 문적 배경을 가진 연구자들이 참여하는 학제간(Interdisciplinarity) 연구가 이미 혼합 방법을 전제로 하고 있기도 하다. 
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-07-10
            [datetime2] => 07-10
            [last] => 2020-07-10
            [last2] => 07-10
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=427&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=427&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=427&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=427&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 5
        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 428
            [wr_num] => -428
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 428
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 제31권 제1호
            [wr_content] => 류영아 / 지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석 ··································1 

김홍환 / 인구구조변화에 따른 지방정치구조의 변화···············································23 

최용환 / 지방자치단체 주민소환제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구 ·································51 

박광표ㆍ김동철ㆍ김대건 / 주민자치회는 민주시민교육의 장이 될 수 있는가? ·············73  

임형백 / 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안 ·································· 97
            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-제31권-제1호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 4165
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:nyivQtx76MRB3xcu8RiMTczU37D9DW27:YRNvhG4EIkqI9rU2V+NJMHzv0M7jf0zf
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-07-10 10:59:12
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-07-10 10:59:56
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.06.30
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 15943463553.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 제31권 제1호
            [content] => 류영아 / 지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석 ··································1 <br>

김홍환 / 인구구조변화에 따른 지방정치구조의 변화···············································23&nbsp;<br>

최용환 / 지방자치단체 주민소환제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구 ·································51 <br>

박광표ㆍ김동철ㆍ김대건 / 주민자치회는 민주시민교육의 장이 될 수 있는가? ·············73&nbsp; <br>

임형백 / 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안 ·································· 97
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-07-10
            [datetime2] => 07-10
            [last] => 2020-07-10
            [last2] => 07-10
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=428&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=428&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=428&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=428&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 4
        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 429
            [wr_num] => -429
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 429
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-발전국가모델-한국-일본-대만의-경제발전-경험이-국제개발협력에
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1982
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:FZu9qRGI+8FOzNfbIc942ETuLUOyX+/a:kd86yBzOjJJcXFAVYYMTL+7leFiFGtfT
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:10:21
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:09
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 3
        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 438
            [wr_num] => -438
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 438
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [wr_content] => 

이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1



기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23



라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47



Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71
: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.



목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99
: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로



박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131



임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151



조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177
: 경기도를 중심으로



조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-31-2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 4476
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:gCwB5CgWuJst+vAheUqVeRxHMBAkh3aX:88i6aBiBtS2HOSyy1qTZMeluORgCnBYy
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:25:26
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:27:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 16099108683.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [content] => <p>이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><div>기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23</div><br><br>

<div>라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47</div><br><br>

<div>Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71</div><div>: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.</div><br><br>

<div>목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99</div><div>: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131</div><br><br>

<div>임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151</div><br><br>

<div>조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177</div><div>: 경기도를 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 2
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 442
            [wr_num] => -442
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 442
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-1] 아시아, 아메리카, 아프리카 농업유형 비교 : 현대농업 이전에 대한 환경결정론적 해석
            [wr_content] => 

[요약]  


서양 역사에서는 시대를 근세(early modern period), 근대(late modern period), 현대(modern period)로 구분한다. 근세는 대략 16세기 초에 시작된 것으로, 근대는 대략 18세기 중반에 시작된 것으로 여겨진다. 본 연구는 현대농업 이전의 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카의 농업유형을 환경결정론적 시각에서 비교하는 데 목적이 있다. 본 연구에서 현대농업은 제2차 세계대전 이전까지로 본다. 제2차 세계대전 이후 다수의 식민지 국가가 독립하면서, 농촌개발이론과 현대적 의미의 국제개발 협력이 시작되었기 때문이다***. 물론 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카라는 광대한 지역을 하나의 단위로 묶어 비교하는 데에는 한계가 있다. 그래서 이 연구는 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카의 3개 대륙에 대하여, 자연환경 및 사회환경, 작물, 가축의 4개 범주를 비교하였다. 아시아는 자연환경과 사회환경, 작물, 그리고 가축의 측면에서 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 유리하였다. 이러한 이유로 아시아는 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 농업이 빨리 발전할 수 있었다. 즉 아시아가 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 농업이 발전한 것은, 인종의 우월성이 아니라 자연 및 사회적 환경 때문이었다. 또 아시아는 라틴아메리카와 아프리카와 농업유형에서도 차이를 보이고 있다. 이는 국제개발협력을 실시함에 있어서, 아시아, 그리고 아시아의 수도작(rice cultivation) 농경유형에 해당하는 한국의 농업 및 농촌발전 경험을 그대로 원조수원국(recipient country)에 전달하는 것이 가능하지 않다는 것을 의미한다. 즉 라틴아메리카와 아프리카의 원조수원국에 농업에 대하여 국제개발협력을 실시할 경우, 한국과의 차이점을 고려하고 이를 반영하는 것이 필요하다.




{게시판명} 목록 - 번호, 제목, 작성자, 작성일, 조회수, 첨부 정보 제공
번호 제목 작성자 작성일 조회수 첨부

            [wr_seo_title] => 32-1-아시아-아메리카-아프리카-농업유형-비교-현대농업
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1606
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-06-02 14:16:45
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-06-02 14:16:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.05.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-1] 아시아, 아메리카, 아프리카 농업유형 비교 : 현대농업 이전에 대한 환경결정론적 해석
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" style="" attr_no_border_tbl="1" class="__se_tbl"><tbody>

<tr><td style="width: 1026px; height: 324px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><p><b>[요약]</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>서양 역사에서는 시대를 근세(early modern period), 근대(late modern period), 현대(modern period)로 구분한다. 근세는 대략 16세기 초에 시작된 것으로, 근대는 대략 18세기 중반에 시작된 것으로 여겨진다. 본 연구는 현대농업 이전의 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카의 농업유형을 환경결정론적 시각에서 비교하는 데 목적이 있다. 본 연구에서 현대농업은 제2차 세계대전 이전까지로 본다. 제2차 세계대전 이후 다수의 식민지 국가가 독립하면서, 농촌개발이론과 현대적 의미의 국제개발 협력이 시작되었기 때문이다***. 물론 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카라는 광대한 지역을 하나의 단위로 묶어 비교하는 데에는 한계가 있다. 그래서 이 연구는 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카의 3개 대륙에 대하여, 자연환경 및 사회환경, 작물, 가축의 4개 범주를 비교하였다. 아시아는 자연환경과 사회환경, 작물, 그리고 가축의 측면에서 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 유리하였다. 이러한 이유로 아시아는 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 농업이 빨리 발전할 수 있었다. 즉 아시아가 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 농업이 발전한 것은, 인종의 우월성이 아니라 자연 및 사회적 환경 때문이었다. 또 아시아는 라틴아메리카와 아프리카와 농업유형에서도 차이를 보이고 있다. 이는 국제개발협력을 실시함에 있어서, 아시아, 그리고 아시아의 수도작(rice cultivation) 농경유형에 해당하는 한국의 농업 및 농촌발전 경험을 그대로 원조수원국(recipient country)에 전달하는 것이 가능하지 않다는 것을 의미한다. 즉 라틴아메리카와 아프리카의 원조수원국에 농업에 대하여 국제개발협력을 실시할 경우, 한국과의 차이점을 고려하고 이를 반영하는 것이 필요하다.</p></td>

</tr>

</tbody>

</table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-06-02
            [datetime2] => 06-02
            [last] => 2021-06-02
            [last2] => 06-02
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=442&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=442&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=442&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=442&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 1
        )

)
5 [31-1] 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안 관리자 2020.07.10 2,962 파일첨부 Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 427
            [wr_num] => -427
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 427
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-1] 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안
            [wr_content] => 사회과학에서 양적 방법과 질적 방법 간의 논쟁은 역사가 오래되었다. 양적 방법과 질적 방법이 양 립불가능한 것으로 보는 견해도 있고, 양립가능한 것으로 보는 견해도 있다. 그러나 학문적 논쟁과는 별개로, 연구에 있어서는 연구자의 목적에 따라 질적 방법과 양적 방법이 다양하게 쓰이고 있으며, 혼합 연구가 유용한 연구결과들을 내놓고 있다. 혼합 방법은 ‘삼각법’이라고 불리기도 한다. 한편 현 실적으로 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가에 있어서는 양적 방법과 질적 방법을 같이 사용할 수 밖에 없다. 학술적 논쟁보다는 국제개발협력 프로젝트에 대한 정확한 평가를 위해서 필요하다. 왜냐하면 수원국에는 통계와 같은 양적자료가 충분하지도 않을 뿐만 아니라, 현장연구가 필수적이기 때문이다. 실제로 대부분의 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가는 혼합 방법에 의존한다. 그럼에도 국제개발협력 분야 에서 양적 방법, 질적 방법, 혼합 방법에 대한 고찰은 부족하다. 이 논문은 양적 방법과 질적 방법 의 비교를 위한 기본 문제를 8개의 범주로 나누어 고찰하였다. 그리고 양적 방법과 질적 방법의 양 립이 가능하다는 주장, 즉 혼합 방법의 이론적 근거, 방법, 기대 효과를 고찰하였다. 마지막으로 국 제개발협력 프로젝트 평가를 위한 혼합 방법의 적용을 7개의 범주로 나누어 고찰하였다. 무엇보다 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가에 있어서는 양적 방법과 질적 방법이 학술적 논쟁과는 별 개로 모두 사용되고 있다. 수원국(recipient country)에는 통계 등 양적 자료가 충분하지 않을 뿐더 러, 양적 자료로 측정할 수 없는 것이 많다. 또 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가는 반드시 현장연구가 수행되어야 하며, 지역연구, 인터뷰 등 질적 연구 방법이 많이 사용되고 있다. 또 평가에 다양한 학 문적 배경을 가진 연구자들이 참여하는 학제간(Interdisciplinarity) 연구가 이미 혼합 방법을 전제로 하고 있기도 하다. 
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-1-국제개발협력-프로젝트-평가에-혼합-방법-적용-방안
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2962
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:8wyGmlYT38xHs0xP3OJ1dwY/3utN9Um8:419nW8SCzkSmx81ywSlp84ZKOHngffNl
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-07-10 10:54:26
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-07-10 10:54:26
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.06.30
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-1] 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안
            [content] => 사회과학에서 양적 방법과 질적 방법 간의 논쟁은 역사가 오래되었다. 양적 방법과 질적 방법이 양 립불가능한 것으로 보는 견해도 있고, 양립가능한 것으로 보는 견해도 있다. 그러나 학문적 논쟁과는 별개로, 연구에 있어서는 연구자의 목적에 따라 질적 방법과 양적 방법이 다양하게 쓰이고 있으며, 혼합 연구가 유용한 연구결과들을 내놓고 있다. 혼합 방법은 ‘삼각법’이라고 불리기도 한다. 한편 현 실적으로 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가에 있어서는 양적 방법과 질적 방법을 같이 사용할 수 밖에 없다. 학술적 논쟁보다는 국제개발협력 프로젝트에 대한 정확한 평가를 위해서 필요하다. 왜냐하면 수원국에는 통계와 같은 양적자료가 충분하지도 않을 뿐만 아니라, 현장연구가 필수적이기 때문이다. 실제로 대부분의 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가는 혼합 방법에 의존한다. 그럼에도 국제개발협력 분야 에서 양적 방법, 질적 방법, 혼합 방법에 대한 고찰은 부족하다. 이 논문은 양적 방법과 질적 방법 의 비교를 위한 기본 문제를 8개의 범주로 나누어 고찰하였다. 그리고 양적 방법과 질적 방법의 양 립이 가능하다는 주장, 즉 혼합 방법의 이론적 근거, 방법, 기대 효과를 고찰하였다. 마지막으로 국 제개발협력 프로젝트 평가를 위한 혼합 방법의 적용을 7개의 범주로 나누어 고찰하였다. 무엇보다 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가에 있어서는 양적 방법과 질적 방법이 학술적 논쟁과는 별 개로 모두 사용되고 있다. 수원국(recipient country)에는 통계 등 양적 자료가 충분하지 않을 뿐더 러, 양적 자료로 측정할 수 없는 것이 많다. 또 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가는 반드시 현장연구가 수행되어야 하며, 지역연구, 인터뷰 등 질적 연구 방법이 많이 사용되고 있다. 또 평가에 다양한 학 문적 배경을 가진 연구자들이 참여하는 학제간(Interdisciplinarity) 연구가 이미 혼합 방법을 전제로 하고 있기도 하다.&nbsp;
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-07-10
            [datetime2] => 07-10
            [last] => 2020-07-10
            [last2] => 07-10
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=427&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=427&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=427&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=427&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 5
        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 428
            [wr_num] => -428
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 428
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 제31권 제1호
            [wr_content] => 류영아 / 지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석 ··································1 

김홍환 / 인구구조변화에 따른 지방정치구조의 변화···············································23 

최용환 / 지방자치단체 주민소환제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구 ·································51 

박광표ㆍ김동철ㆍ김대건 / 주민자치회는 민주시민교육의 장이 될 수 있는가? ·············73  

임형백 / 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안 ·································· 97
            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-제31권-제1호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 4165
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:nyivQtx76MRB3xcu8RiMTczU37D9DW27:YRNvhG4EIkqI9rU2V+NJMHzv0M7jf0zf
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-07-10 10:59:12
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-07-10 10:59:56
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.06.30
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 15943463553.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 제31권 제1호
            [content] => 류영아 / 지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석 ··································1 <br>

김홍환 / 인구구조변화에 따른 지방정치구조의 변화···············································23&nbsp;<br>

최용환 / 지방자치단체 주민소환제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구 ·································51 <br>

박광표ㆍ김동철ㆍ김대건 / 주민자치회는 민주시민교육의 장이 될 수 있는가? ·············73&nbsp; <br>

임형백 / 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안 ·································· 97
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-07-10
            [datetime2] => 07-10
            [last] => 2020-07-10
            [last2] => 07-10
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=428&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=428&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=428&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=428&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 4
        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 429
            [wr_num] => -429
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 429
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-발전국가모델-한국-일본-대만의-경제발전-경험이-국제개발협력에
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1982
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:FZu9qRGI+8FOzNfbIc942ETuLUOyX+/a:kd86yBzOjJJcXFAVYYMTL+7leFiFGtfT
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:10:21
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:09
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 3
        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 438
            [wr_num] => -438
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 438
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [wr_content] => 

이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1



기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23



라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47



Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71
: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.



목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99
: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로



박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131



임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151



조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177
: 경기도를 중심으로



조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-31-2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 4476
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:gCwB5CgWuJst+vAheUqVeRxHMBAkh3aX:88i6aBiBtS2HOSyy1qTZMeluORgCnBYy
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:25:26
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:27:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 16099108683.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [content] => <p>이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><div>기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23</div><br><br>

<div>라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47</div><br><br>

<div>Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71</div><div>: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.</div><br><br>

<div>목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99</div><div>: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131</div><br><br>

<div>임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151</div><br><br>

<div>조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177</div><div>: 경기도를 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 2
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 442
            [wr_num] => -442
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 442
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-1] 아시아, 아메리카, 아프리카 농업유형 비교 : 현대농업 이전에 대한 환경결정론적 해석
            [wr_content] => 

[요약]  


서양 역사에서는 시대를 근세(early modern period), 근대(late modern period), 현대(modern period)로 구분한다. 근세는 대략 16세기 초에 시작된 것으로, 근대는 대략 18세기 중반에 시작된 것으로 여겨진다. 본 연구는 현대농업 이전의 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카의 농업유형을 환경결정론적 시각에서 비교하는 데 목적이 있다. 본 연구에서 현대농업은 제2차 세계대전 이전까지로 본다. 제2차 세계대전 이후 다수의 식민지 국가가 독립하면서, 농촌개발이론과 현대적 의미의 국제개발 협력이 시작되었기 때문이다***. 물론 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카라는 광대한 지역을 하나의 단위로 묶어 비교하는 데에는 한계가 있다. 그래서 이 연구는 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카의 3개 대륙에 대하여, 자연환경 및 사회환경, 작물, 가축의 4개 범주를 비교하였다. 아시아는 자연환경과 사회환경, 작물, 그리고 가축의 측면에서 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 유리하였다. 이러한 이유로 아시아는 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 농업이 빨리 발전할 수 있었다. 즉 아시아가 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 농업이 발전한 것은, 인종의 우월성이 아니라 자연 및 사회적 환경 때문이었다. 또 아시아는 라틴아메리카와 아프리카와 농업유형에서도 차이를 보이고 있다. 이는 국제개발협력을 실시함에 있어서, 아시아, 그리고 아시아의 수도작(rice cultivation) 농경유형에 해당하는 한국의 농업 및 농촌발전 경험을 그대로 원조수원국(recipient country)에 전달하는 것이 가능하지 않다는 것을 의미한다. 즉 라틴아메리카와 아프리카의 원조수원국에 농업에 대하여 국제개발협력을 실시할 경우, 한국과의 차이점을 고려하고 이를 반영하는 것이 필요하다.





            [wr_seo_title] => 32-1-아시아-아메리카-아프리카-농업유형-비교-현대농업
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1606
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-06-02 14:16:45
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-06-02 14:16:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.05.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-1] 아시아, 아메리카, 아프리카 농업유형 비교 : 현대농업 이전에 대한 환경결정론적 해석
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" style="" attr_no_border_tbl="1" class="__se_tbl"><tbody>

<tr><td style="width: 1026px; height: 324px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><p><b>[요약]</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>서양 역사에서는 시대를 근세(early modern period), 근대(late modern period), 현대(modern period)로 구분한다. 근세는 대략 16세기 초에 시작된 것으로, 근대는 대략 18세기 중반에 시작된 것으로 여겨진다. 본 연구는 현대농업 이전의 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카의 농업유형을 환경결정론적 시각에서 비교하는 데 목적이 있다. 본 연구에서 현대농업은 제2차 세계대전 이전까지로 본다. 제2차 세계대전 이후 다수의 식민지 국가가 독립하면서, 농촌개발이론과 현대적 의미의 국제개발 협력이 시작되었기 때문이다***. 물론 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카라는 광대한 지역을 하나의 단위로 묶어 비교하는 데에는 한계가 있다. 그래서 이 연구는 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카의 3개 대륙에 대하여, 자연환경 및 사회환경, 작물, 가축의 4개 범주를 비교하였다. 아시아는 자연환경과 사회환경, 작물, 그리고 가축의 측면에서 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 유리하였다. 이러한 이유로 아시아는 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 농업이 빨리 발전할 수 있었다. 즉 아시아가 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 농업이 발전한 것은, 인종의 우월성이 아니라 자연 및 사회적 환경 때문이었다. 또 아시아는 라틴아메리카와 아프리카와 농업유형에서도 차이를 보이고 있다. 이는 국제개발협력을 실시함에 있어서, 아시아, 그리고 아시아의 수도작(rice cultivation) 농경유형에 해당하는 한국의 농업 및 농촌발전 경험을 그대로 원조수원국(recipient country)에 전달하는 것이 가능하지 않다는 것을 의미한다. 즉 라틴아메리카와 아프리카의 원조수원국에 농업에 대하여 국제개발협력을 실시할 경우, 한국과의 차이점을 고려하고 이를 반영하는 것이 필요하다.</p></td>

</tr>

</tbody>

</table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-06-02
            [datetime2] => 06-02
            [last] => 2021-06-02
            [last2] => 06-02
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=442&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=442&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=442&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=442&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 1
        )

)
4 지역정책연구 제31권 제1호 관리자 2020.07.10 4,165 파일첨부 Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 427
            [wr_num] => -427
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 427
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-1] 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안
            [wr_content] => 사회과학에서 양적 방법과 질적 방법 간의 논쟁은 역사가 오래되었다. 양적 방법과 질적 방법이 양 립불가능한 것으로 보는 견해도 있고, 양립가능한 것으로 보는 견해도 있다. 그러나 학문적 논쟁과는 별개로, 연구에 있어서는 연구자의 목적에 따라 질적 방법과 양적 방법이 다양하게 쓰이고 있으며, 혼합 연구가 유용한 연구결과들을 내놓고 있다. 혼합 방법은 ‘삼각법’이라고 불리기도 한다. 한편 현 실적으로 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가에 있어서는 양적 방법과 질적 방법을 같이 사용할 수 밖에 없다. 학술적 논쟁보다는 국제개발협력 프로젝트에 대한 정확한 평가를 위해서 필요하다. 왜냐하면 수원국에는 통계와 같은 양적자료가 충분하지도 않을 뿐만 아니라, 현장연구가 필수적이기 때문이다. 실제로 대부분의 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가는 혼합 방법에 의존한다. 그럼에도 국제개발협력 분야 에서 양적 방법, 질적 방법, 혼합 방법에 대한 고찰은 부족하다. 이 논문은 양적 방법과 질적 방법 의 비교를 위한 기본 문제를 8개의 범주로 나누어 고찰하였다. 그리고 양적 방법과 질적 방법의 양 립이 가능하다는 주장, 즉 혼합 방법의 이론적 근거, 방법, 기대 효과를 고찰하였다. 마지막으로 국 제개발협력 프로젝트 평가를 위한 혼합 방법의 적용을 7개의 범주로 나누어 고찰하였다. 무엇보다 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가에 있어서는 양적 방법과 질적 방법이 학술적 논쟁과는 별 개로 모두 사용되고 있다. 수원국(recipient country)에는 통계 등 양적 자료가 충분하지 않을 뿐더 러, 양적 자료로 측정할 수 없는 것이 많다. 또 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가는 반드시 현장연구가 수행되어야 하며, 지역연구, 인터뷰 등 질적 연구 방법이 많이 사용되고 있다. 또 평가에 다양한 학 문적 배경을 가진 연구자들이 참여하는 학제간(Interdisciplinarity) 연구가 이미 혼합 방법을 전제로 하고 있기도 하다. 
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-1-국제개발협력-프로젝트-평가에-혼합-방법-적용-방안
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2962
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:8wyGmlYT38xHs0xP3OJ1dwY/3utN9Um8:419nW8SCzkSmx81ywSlp84ZKOHngffNl
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-07-10 10:54:26
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-07-10 10:54:26
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.06.30
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-1] 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안
            [content] => 사회과학에서 양적 방법과 질적 방법 간의 논쟁은 역사가 오래되었다. 양적 방법과 질적 방법이 양 립불가능한 것으로 보는 견해도 있고, 양립가능한 것으로 보는 견해도 있다. 그러나 학문적 논쟁과는 별개로, 연구에 있어서는 연구자의 목적에 따라 질적 방법과 양적 방법이 다양하게 쓰이고 있으며, 혼합 연구가 유용한 연구결과들을 내놓고 있다. 혼합 방법은 ‘삼각법’이라고 불리기도 한다. 한편 현 실적으로 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가에 있어서는 양적 방법과 질적 방법을 같이 사용할 수 밖에 없다. 학술적 논쟁보다는 국제개발협력 프로젝트에 대한 정확한 평가를 위해서 필요하다. 왜냐하면 수원국에는 통계와 같은 양적자료가 충분하지도 않을 뿐만 아니라, 현장연구가 필수적이기 때문이다. 실제로 대부분의 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가는 혼합 방법에 의존한다. 그럼에도 국제개발협력 분야 에서 양적 방법, 질적 방법, 혼합 방법에 대한 고찰은 부족하다. 이 논문은 양적 방법과 질적 방법 의 비교를 위한 기본 문제를 8개의 범주로 나누어 고찰하였다. 그리고 양적 방법과 질적 방법의 양 립이 가능하다는 주장, 즉 혼합 방법의 이론적 근거, 방법, 기대 효과를 고찰하였다. 마지막으로 국 제개발협력 프로젝트 평가를 위한 혼합 방법의 적용을 7개의 범주로 나누어 고찰하였다. 무엇보다 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가에 있어서는 양적 방법과 질적 방법이 학술적 논쟁과는 별 개로 모두 사용되고 있다. 수원국(recipient country)에는 통계 등 양적 자료가 충분하지 않을 뿐더 러, 양적 자료로 측정할 수 없는 것이 많다. 또 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가는 반드시 현장연구가 수행되어야 하며, 지역연구, 인터뷰 등 질적 연구 방법이 많이 사용되고 있다. 또 평가에 다양한 학 문적 배경을 가진 연구자들이 참여하는 학제간(Interdisciplinarity) 연구가 이미 혼합 방법을 전제로 하고 있기도 하다.&nbsp;
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-07-10
            [datetime2] => 07-10
            [last] => 2020-07-10
            [last2] => 07-10
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=427&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=427&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=427&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=427&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 5
        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 428
            [wr_num] => -428
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 428
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 제31권 제1호
            [wr_content] => 류영아 / 지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석 ··································1 

김홍환 / 인구구조변화에 따른 지방정치구조의 변화···············································23 

최용환 / 지방자치단체 주민소환제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구 ·································51 

박광표ㆍ김동철ㆍ김대건 / 주민자치회는 민주시민교육의 장이 될 수 있는가? ·············73  

임형백 / 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안 ·································· 97
            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-제31권-제1호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 4165
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:nyivQtx76MRB3xcu8RiMTczU37D9DW27:YRNvhG4EIkqI9rU2V+NJMHzv0M7jf0zf
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-07-10 10:59:12
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-07-10 10:59:56
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.06.30
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 15943463553.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 제31권 제1호
            [content] => 류영아 / 지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석 ··································1 <br>

김홍환 / 인구구조변화에 따른 지방정치구조의 변화···············································23&nbsp;<br>

최용환 / 지방자치단체 주민소환제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구 ·································51 <br>

박광표ㆍ김동철ㆍ김대건 / 주민자치회는 민주시민교육의 장이 될 수 있는가? ·············73&nbsp; <br>

임형백 / 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안 ·································· 97
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-07-10
            [datetime2] => 07-10
            [last] => 2020-07-10
            [last2] => 07-10
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=428&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=428&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=428&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=428&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 4
        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 429
            [wr_num] => -429
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 429
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-발전국가모델-한국-일본-대만의-경제발전-경험이-국제개발협력에
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1982
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:FZu9qRGI+8FOzNfbIc942ETuLUOyX+/a:kd86yBzOjJJcXFAVYYMTL+7leFiFGtfT
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:10:21
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:09
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 3
        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 438
            [wr_num] => -438
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 438
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [wr_content] => 

이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1



기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23



라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47



Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71
: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.



목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99
: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로



박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131



임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151



조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177
: 경기도를 중심으로



조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-31-2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 4476
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:gCwB5CgWuJst+vAheUqVeRxHMBAkh3aX:88i6aBiBtS2HOSyy1qTZMeluORgCnBYy
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:25:26
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:27:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 16099108683.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [content] => <p>이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><div>기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23</div><br><br>

<div>라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47</div><br><br>

<div>Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71</div><div>: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.</div><br><br>

<div>목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99</div><div>: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131</div><br><br>

<div>임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151</div><br><br>

<div>조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177</div><div>: 경기도를 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 2
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 442
            [wr_num] => -442
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 442
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-1] 아시아, 아메리카, 아프리카 농업유형 비교 : 현대농업 이전에 대한 환경결정론적 해석
            [wr_content] => 

[요약]  


서양 역사에서는 시대를 근세(early modern period), 근대(late modern period), 현대(modern period)로 구분한다. 근세는 대략 16세기 초에 시작된 것으로, 근대는 대략 18세기 중반에 시작된 것으로 여겨진다. 본 연구는 현대농업 이전의 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카의 농업유형을 환경결정론적 시각에서 비교하는 데 목적이 있다. 본 연구에서 현대농업은 제2차 세계대전 이전까지로 본다. 제2차 세계대전 이후 다수의 식민지 국가가 독립하면서, 농촌개발이론과 현대적 의미의 국제개발 협력이 시작되었기 때문이다***. 물론 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카라는 광대한 지역을 하나의 단위로 묶어 비교하는 데에는 한계가 있다. 그래서 이 연구는 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카의 3개 대륙에 대하여, 자연환경 및 사회환경, 작물, 가축의 4개 범주를 비교하였다. 아시아는 자연환경과 사회환경, 작물, 그리고 가축의 측면에서 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 유리하였다. 이러한 이유로 아시아는 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 농업이 빨리 발전할 수 있었다. 즉 아시아가 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 농업이 발전한 것은, 인종의 우월성이 아니라 자연 및 사회적 환경 때문이었다. 또 아시아는 라틴아메리카와 아프리카와 농업유형에서도 차이를 보이고 있다. 이는 국제개발협력을 실시함에 있어서, 아시아, 그리고 아시아의 수도작(rice cultivation) 농경유형에 해당하는 한국의 농업 및 농촌발전 경험을 그대로 원조수원국(recipient country)에 전달하는 것이 가능하지 않다는 것을 의미한다. 즉 라틴아메리카와 아프리카의 원조수원국에 농업에 대하여 국제개발협력을 실시할 경우, 한국과의 차이점을 고려하고 이를 반영하는 것이 필요하다.





            [wr_seo_title] => 32-1-아시아-아메리카-아프리카-농업유형-비교-현대농업
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1606
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-06-02 14:16:45
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-06-02 14:16:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.05.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-1] 아시아, 아메리카, 아프리카 농업유형 비교 : 현대농업 이전에 대한 환경결정론적 해석
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" style="" attr_no_border_tbl="1" class="__se_tbl"><tbody>

<tr><td style="width: 1026px; height: 324px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><p><b>[요약]</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>서양 역사에서는 시대를 근세(early modern period), 근대(late modern period), 현대(modern period)로 구분한다. 근세는 대략 16세기 초에 시작된 것으로, 근대는 대략 18세기 중반에 시작된 것으로 여겨진다. 본 연구는 현대농업 이전의 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카의 농업유형을 환경결정론적 시각에서 비교하는 데 목적이 있다. 본 연구에서 현대농업은 제2차 세계대전 이전까지로 본다. 제2차 세계대전 이후 다수의 식민지 국가가 독립하면서, 농촌개발이론과 현대적 의미의 국제개발 협력이 시작되었기 때문이다***. 물론 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카라는 광대한 지역을 하나의 단위로 묶어 비교하는 데에는 한계가 있다. 그래서 이 연구는 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카의 3개 대륙에 대하여, 자연환경 및 사회환경, 작물, 가축의 4개 범주를 비교하였다. 아시아는 자연환경과 사회환경, 작물, 그리고 가축의 측면에서 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 유리하였다. 이러한 이유로 아시아는 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 농업이 빨리 발전할 수 있었다. 즉 아시아가 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 농업이 발전한 것은, 인종의 우월성이 아니라 자연 및 사회적 환경 때문이었다. 또 아시아는 라틴아메리카와 아프리카와 농업유형에서도 차이를 보이고 있다. 이는 국제개발협력을 실시함에 있어서, 아시아, 그리고 아시아의 수도작(rice cultivation) 농경유형에 해당하는 한국의 농업 및 농촌발전 경험을 그대로 원조수원국(recipient country)에 전달하는 것이 가능하지 않다는 것을 의미한다. 즉 라틴아메리카와 아프리카의 원조수원국에 농업에 대하여 국제개발협력을 실시할 경우, 한국과의 차이점을 고려하고 이를 반영하는 것이 필요하다.</p></td>

</tr>

</tbody>

</table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-06-02
            [datetime2] => 06-02
            [last] => 2021-06-02
            [last2] => 06-02
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=442&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=442&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=442&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=442&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 1
        )

)
3 [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 관리자 2021.01.06 1,982 파일첨부 Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 427
            [wr_num] => -427
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 427
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-1] 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안
            [wr_content] => 사회과학에서 양적 방법과 질적 방법 간의 논쟁은 역사가 오래되었다. 양적 방법과 질적 방법이 양 립불가능한 것으로 보는 견해도 있고, 양립가능한 것으로 보는 견해도 있다. 그러나 학문적 논쟁과는 별개로, 연구에 있어서는 연구자의 목적에 따라 질적 방법과 양적 방법이 다양하게 쓰이고 있으며, 혼합 연구가 유용한 연구결과들을 내놓고 있다. 혼합 방법은 ‘삼각법’이라고 불리기도 한다. 한편 현 실적으로 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가에 있어서는 양적 방법과 질적 방법을 같이 사용할 수 밖에 없다. 학술적 논쟁보다는 국제개발협력 프로젝트에 대한 정확한 평가를 위해서 필요하다. 왜냐하면 수원국에는 통계와 같은 양적자료가 충분하지도 않을 뿐만 아니라, 현장연구가 필수적이기 때문이다. 실제로 대부분의 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가는 혼합 방법에 의존한다. 그럼에도 국제개발협력 분야 에서 양적 방법, 질적 방법, 혼합 방법에 대한 고찰은 부족하다. 이 논문은 양적 방법과 질적 방법 의 비교를 위한 기본 문제를 8개의 범주로 나누어 고찰하였다. 그리고 양적 방법과 질적 방법의 양 립이 가능하다는 주장, 즉 혼합 방법의 이론적 근거, 방법, 기대 효과를 고찰하였다. 마지막으로 국 제개발협력 프로젝트 평가를 위한 혼합 방법의 적용을 7개의 범주로 나누어 고찰하였다. 무엇보다 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가에 있어서는 양적 방법과 질적 방법이 학술적 논쟁과는 별 개로 모두 사용되고 있다. 수원국(recipient country)에는 통계 등 양적 자료가 충분하지 않을 뿐더 러, 양적 자료로 측정할 수 없는 것이 많다. 또 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가는 반드시 현장연구가 수행되어야 하며, 지역연구, 인터뷰 등 질적 연구 방법이 많이 사용되고 있다. 또 평가에 다양한 학 문적 배경을 가진 연구자들이 참여하는 학제간(Interdisciplinarity) 연구가 이미 혼합 방법을 전제로 하고 있기도 하다. 
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-1-국제개발협력-프로젝트-평가에-혼합-방법-적용-방안
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2962
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:8wyGmlYT38xHs0xP3OJ1dwY/3utN9Um8:419nW8SCzkSmx81ywSlp84ZKOHngffNl
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-07-10 10:54:26
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-07-10 10:54:26
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.06.30
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-1] 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안
            [content] => 사회과학에서 양적 방법과 질적 방법 간의 논쟁은 역사가 오래되었다. 양적 방법과 질적 방법이 양 립불가능한 것으로 보는 견해도 있고, 양립가능한 것으로 보는 견해도 있다. 그러나 학문적 논쟁과는 별개로, 연구에 있어서는 연구자의 목적에 따라 질적 방법과 양적 방법이 다양하게 쓰이고 있으며, 혼합 연구가 유용한 연구결과들을 내놓고 있다. 혼합 방법은 ‘삼각법’이라고 불리기도 한다. 한편 현 실적으로 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가에 있어서는 양적 방법과 질적 방법을 같이 사용할 수 밖에 없다. 학술적 논쟁보다는 국제개발협력 프로젝트에 대한 정확한 평가를 위해서 필요하다. 왜냐하면 수원국에는 통계와 같은 양적자료가 충분하지도 않을 뿐만 아니라, 현장연구가 필수적이기 때문이다. 실제로 대부분의 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가는 혼합 방법에 의존한다. 그럼에도 국제개발협력 분야 에서 양적 방법, 질적 방법, 혼합 방법에 대한 고찰은 부족하다. 이 논문은 양적 방법과 질적 방법 의 비교를 위한 기본 문제를 8개의 범주로 나누어 고찰하였다. 그리고 양적 방법과 질적 방법의 양 립이 가능하다는 주장, 즉 혼합 방법의 이론적 근거, 방법, 기대 효과를 고찰하였다. 마지막으로 국 제개발협력 프로젝트 평가를 위한 혼합 방법의 적용을 7개의 범주로 나누어 고찰하였다. 무엇보다 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가에 있어서는 양적 방법과 질적 방법이 학술적 논쟁과는 별 개로 모두 사용되고 있다. 수원국(recipient country)에는 통계 등 양적 자료가 충분하지 않을 뿐더 러, 양적 자료로 측정할 수 없는 것이 많다. 또 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가는 반드시 현장연구가 수행되어야 하며, 지역연구, 인터뷰 등 질적 연구 방법이 많이 사용되고 있다. 또 평가에 다양한 학 문적 배경을 가진 연구자들이 참여하는 학제간(Interdisciplinarity) 연구가 이미 혼합 방법을 전제로 하고 있기도 하다.&nbsp;
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-07-10
            [datetime2] => 07-10
            [last] => 2020-07-10
            [last2] => 07-10
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=427&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=427&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=427&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=427&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 5
        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 428
            [wr_num] => -428
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 428
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 제31권 제1호
            [wr_content] => 류영아 / 지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석 ··································1 

김홍환 / 인구구조변화에 따른 지방정치구조의 변화···············································23 

최용환 / 지방자치단체 주민소환제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구 ·································51 

박광표ㆍ김동철ㆍ김대건 / 주민자치회는 민주시민교육의 장이 될 수 있는가? ·············73  

임형백 / 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안 ·································· 97
            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-제31권-제1호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 4165
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:nyivQtx76MRB3xcu8RiMTczU37D9DW27:YRNvhG4EIkqI9rU2V+NJMHzv0M7jf0zf
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-07-10 10:59:12
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-07-10 10:59:56
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.06.30
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 15943463553.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 제31권 제1호
            [content] => 류영아 / 지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석 ··································1 <br>

김홍환 / 인구구조변화에 따른 지방정치구조의 변화···············································23&nbsp;<br>

최용환 / 지방자치단체 주민소환제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구 ·································51 <br>

박광표ㆍ김동철ㆍ김대건 / 주민자치회는 민주시민교육의 장이 될 수 있는가? ·············73&nbsp; <br>

임형백 / 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안 ·································· 97
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-07-10
            [datetime2] => 07-10
            [last] => 2020-07-10
            [last2] => 07-10
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=428&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=428&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=428&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=428&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 4
        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 429
            [wr_num] => -429
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 429
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-발전국가모델-한국-일본-대만의-경제발전-경험이-국제개발협력에
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1982
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:FZu9qRGI+8FOzNfbIc942ETuLUOyX+/a:kd86yBzOjJJcXFAVYYMTL+7leFiFGtfT
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:10:21
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:09
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 3
        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 438
            [wr_num] => -438
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 438
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [wr_content] => 

이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1



기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23



라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47



Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71
: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.



목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99
: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로



박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131



임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151



조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177
: 경기도를 중심으로



조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-31-2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 4476
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:gCwB5CgWuJst+vAheUqVeRxHMBAkh3aX:88i6aBiBtS2HOSyy1qTZMeluORgCnBYy
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:25:26
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:27:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 16099108683.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [content] => <p>이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><div>기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23</div><br><br>

<div>라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47</div><br><br>

<div>Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71</div><div>: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.</div><br><br>

<div>목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99</div><div>: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131</div><br><br>

<div>임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151</div><br><br>

<div>조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177</div><div>: 경기도를 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 2
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 442
            [wr_num] => -442
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 442
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-1] 아시아, 아메리카, 아프리카 농업유형 비교 : 현대농업 이전에 대한 환경결정론적 해석
            [wr_content] => 

[요약]  


서양 역사에서는 시대를 근세(early modern period), 근대(late modern period), 현대(modern period)로 구분한다. 근세는 대략 16세기 초에 시작된 것으로, 근대는 대략 18세기 중반에 시작된 것으로 여겨진다. 본 연구는 현대농업 이전의 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카의 농업유형을 환경결정론적 시각에서 비교하는 데 목적이 있다. 본 연구에서 현대농업은 제2차 세계대전 이전까지로 본다. 제2차 세계대전 이후 다수의 식민지 국가가 독립하면서, 농촌개발이론과 현대적 의미의 국제개발 협력이 시작되었기 때문이다***. 물론 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카라는 광대한 지역을 하나의 단위로 묶어 비교하는 데에는 한계가 있다. 그래서 이 연구는 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카의 3개 대륙에 대하여, 자연환경 및 사회환경, 작물, 가축의 4개 범주를 비교하였다. 아시아는 자연환경과 사회환경, 작물, 그리고 가축의 측면에서 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 유리하였다. 이러한 이유로 아시아는 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 농업이 빨리 발전할 수 있었다. 즉 아시아가 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 농업이 발전한 것은, 인종의 우월성이 아니라 자연 및 사회적 환경 때문이었다. 또 아시아는 라틴아메리카와 아프리카와 농업유형에서도 차이를 보이고 있다. 이는 국제개발협력을 실시함에 있어서, 아시아, 그리고 아시아의 수도작(rice cultivation) 농경유형에 해당하는 한국의 농업 및 농촌발전 경험을 그대로 원조수원국(recipient country)에 전달하는 것이 가능하지 않다는 것을 의미한다. 즉 라틴아메리카와 아프리카의 원조수원국에 농업에 대하여 국제개발협력을 실시할 경우, 한국과의 차이점을 고려하고 이를 반영하는 것이 필요하다.





            [wr_seo_title] => 32-1-아시아-아메리카-아프리카-농업유형-비교-현대농업
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1606
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-06-02 14:16:45
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-06-02 14:16:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.05.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-1] 아시아, 아메리카, 아프리카 농업유형 비교 : 현대농업 이전에 대한 환경결정론적 해석
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" style="" attr_no_border_tbl="1" class="__se_tbl"><tbody>

<tr><td style="width: 1026px; height: 324px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><p><b>[요약]</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>서양 역사에서는 시대를 근세(early modern period), 근대(late modern period), 현대(modern period)로 구분한다. 근세는 대략 16세기 초에 시작된 것으로, 근대는 대략 18세기 중반에 시작된 것으로 여겨진다. 본 연구는 현대농업 이전의 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카의 농업유형을 환경결정론적 시각에서 비교하는 데 목적이 있다. 본 연구에서 현대농업은 제2차 세계대전 이전까지로 본다. 제2차 세계대전 이후 다수의 식민지 국가가 독립하면서, 농촌개발이론과 현대적 의미의 국제개발 협력이 시작되었기 때문이다***. 물론 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카라는 광대한 지역을 하나의 단위로 묶어 비교하는 데에는 한계가 있다. 그래서 이 연구는 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카의 3개 대륙에 대하여, 자연환경 및 사회환경, 작물, 가축의 4개 범주를 비교하였다. 아시아는 자연환경과 사회환경, 작물, 그리고 가축의 측면에서 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 유리하였다. 이러한 이유로 아시아는 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 농업이 빨리 발전할 수 있었다. 즉 아시아가 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 농업이 발전한 것은, 인종의 우월성이 아니라 자연 및 사회적 환경 때문이었다. 또 아시아는 라틴아메리카와 아프리카와 농업유형에서도 차이를 보이고 있다. 이는 국제개발협력을 실시함에 있어서, 아시아, 그리고 아시아의 수도작(rice cultivation) 농경유형에 해당하는 한국의 농업 및 농촌발전 경험을 그대로 원조수원국(recipient country)에 전달하는 것이 가능하지 않다는 것을 의미한다. 즉 라틴아메리카와 아프리카의 원조수원국에 농업에 대하여 국제개발협력을 실시할 경우, 한국과의 차이점을 고려하고 이를 반영하는 것이 필요하다.</p></td>

</tr>

</tbody>

</table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-06-02
            [datetime2] => 06-02
            [last] => 2021-06-02
            [last2] => 06-02
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=442&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=442&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=442&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=442&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 1
        )

)
2 지역정책연구 [31-2호] 관리자 2021.01.06 4,476 파일첨부 Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 427
            [wr_num] => -427
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 427
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-1] 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안
            [wr_content] => 사회과학에서 양적 방법과 질적 방법 간의 논쟁은 역사가 오래되었다. 양적 방법과 질적 방법이 양 립불가능한 것으로 보는 견해도 있고, 양립가능한 것으로 보는 견해도 있다. 그러나 학문적 논쟁과는 별개로, 연구에 있어서는 연구자의 목적에 따라 질적 방법과 양적 방법이 다양하게 쓰이고 있으며, 혼합 연구가 유용한 연구결과들을 내놓고 있다. 혼합 방법은 ‘삼각법’이라고 불리기도 한다. 한편 현 실적으로 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가에 있어서는 양적 방법과 질적 방법을 같이 사용할 수 밖에 없다. 학술적 논쟁보다는 국제개발협력 프로젝트에 대한 정확한 평가를 위해서 필요하다. 왜냐하면 수원국에는 통계와 같은 양적자료가 충분하지도 않을 뿐만 아니라, 현장연구가 필수적이기 때문이다. 실제로 대부분의 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가는 혼합 방법에 의존한다. 그럼에도 국제개발협력 분야 에서 양적 방법, 질적 방법, 혼합 방법에 대한 고찰은 부족하다. 이 논문은 양적 방법과 질적 방법 의 비교를 위한 기본 문제를 8개의 범주로 나누어 고찰하였다. 그리고 양적 방법과 질적 방법의 양 립이 가능하다는 주장, 즉 혼합 방법의 이론적 근거, 방법, 기대 효과를 고찰하였다. 마지막으로 국 제개발협력 프로젝트 평가를 위한 혼합 방법의 적용을 7개의 범주로 나누어 고찰하였다. 무엇보다 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가에 있어서는 양적 방법과 질적 방법이 학술적 논쟁과는 별 개로 모두 사용되고 있다. 수원국(recipient country)에는 통계 등 양적 자료가 충분하지 않을 뿐더 러, 양적 자료로 측정할 수 없는 것이 많다. 또 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가는 반드시 현장연구가 수행되어야 하며, 지역연구, 인터뷰 등 질적 연구 방법이 많이 사용되고 있다. 또 평가에 다양한 학 문적 배경을 가진 연구자들이 참여하는 학제간(Interdisciplinarity) 연구가 이미 혼합 방법을 전제로 하고 있기도 하다. 
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-1-국제개발협력-프로젝트-평가에-혼합-방법-적용-방안
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 2962
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:8wyGmlYT38xHs0xP3OJ1dwY/3utN9Um8:419nW8SCzkSmx81ywSlp84ZKOHngffNl
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-07-10 10:54:26
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-07-10 10:54:26
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.06.30
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-1] 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안
            [content] => 사회과학에서 양적 방법과 질적 방법 간의 논쟁은 역사가 오래되었다. 양적 방법과 질적 방법이 양 립불가능한 것으로 보는 견해도 있고, 양립가능한 것으로 보는 견해도 있다. 그러나 학문적 논쟁과는 별개로, 연구에 있어서는 연구자의 목적에 따라 질적 방법과 양적 방법이 다양하게 쓰이고 있으며, 혼합 연구가 유용한 연구결과들을 내놓고 있다. 혼합 방법은 ‘삼각법’이라고 불리기도 한다. 한편 현 실적으로 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가에 있어서는 양적 방법과 질적 방법을 같이 사용할 수 밖에 없다. 학술적 논쟁보다는 국제개발협력 프로젝트에 대한 정확한 평가를 위해서 필요하다. 왜냐하면 수원국에는 통계와 같은 양적자료가 충분하지도 않을 뿐만 아니라, 현장연구가 필수적이기 때문이다. 실제로 대부분의 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가는 혼합 방법에 의존한다. 그럼에도 국제개발협력 분야 에서 양적 방법, 질적 방법, 혼합 방법에 대한 고찰은 부족하다. 이 논문은 양적 방법과 질적 방법 의 비교를 위한 기본 문제를 8개의 범주로 나누어 고찰하였다. 그리고 양적 방법과 질적 방법의 양 립이 가능하다는 주장, 즉 혼합 방법의 이론적 근거, 방법, 기대 효과를 고찰하였다. 마지막으로 국 제개발협력 프로젝트 평가를 위한 혼합 방법의 적용을 7개의 범주로 나누어 고찰하였다. 무엇보다 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가에 있어서는 양적 방법과 질적 방법이 학술적 논쟁과는 별 개로 모두 사용되고 있다. 수원국(recipient country)에는 통계 등 양적 자료가 충분하지 않을 뿐더 러, 양적 자료로 측정할 수 없는 것이 많다. 또 국제개발협력 프로젝트의 평가는 반드시 현장연구가 수행되어야 하며, 지역연구, 인터뷰 등 질적 연구 방법이 많이 사용되고 있다. 또 평가에 다양한 학 문적 배경을 가진 연구자들이 참여하는 학제간(Interdisciplinarity) 연구가 이미 혼합 방법을 전제로 하고 있기도 하다.&nbsp;
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-07-10
            [datetime2] => 07-10
            [last] => 2020-07-10
            [last2] => 07-10
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=427&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=427&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=427&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=427&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 5
        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 428
            [wr_num] => -428
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 428
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 제31권 제1호
            [wr_content] => 류영아 / 지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석 ··································1 

김홍환 / 인구구조변화에 따른 지방정치구조의 변화···············································23 

최용환 / 지방자치단체 주민소환제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구 ·································51 

박광표ㆍ김동철ㆍ김대건 / 주민자치회는 민주시민교육의 장이 될 수 있는가? ·············73  

임형백 / 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안 ·································· 97
            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-제31권-제1호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 4165
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:nyivQtx76MRB3xcu8RiMTczU37D9DW27:YRNvhG4EIkqI9rU2V+NJMHzv0M7jf0zf
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2020-07-10 10:59:12
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2020-07-10 10:59:56
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.06.30
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 15943463553.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 제31권 제1호
            [content] => 류영아 / 지방자치단체별 보통교부세의 재정형평화 기능 분석 ··································1 <br>

김홍환 / 인구구조변화에 따른 지방정치구조의 변화···············································23&nbsp;<br>

최용환 / 지방자치단체 주민소환제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구 ·································51 <br>

박광표ㆍ김동철ㆍ김대건 / 주민자치회는 민주시민교육의 장이 될 수 있는가? ·············73&nbsp; <br>

임형백 / 국제개발협력 프로젝트 평가에 혼합 방법 적용 방안 ·································· 97
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2020-07-10
            [datetime2] => 07-10
            [last] => 2020-07-10
            [last2] => 07-10
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=428&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=428&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=428&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=428&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 4
        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 429
            [wr_num] => -429
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 429
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [wr_content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [wr_seo_title] => 31-2-발전국가모델-한국-일본-대만의-경제발전-경험이-국제개발협력에
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1982
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:FZu9qRGI+8FOzNfbIc942ETuLUOyX+/a:kd86yBzOjJJcXFAVYYMTL+7leFiFGtfT
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:10:21
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:13:09
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [31-2] 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점
            [content] => [초록] 본 연구는 동아시아 발전국가모델의 대표 국가인 한국, 대만, 일본의 경제성장 경험을 정부의 역할, 문화·역사적 환경을 비교하고 국제개발협력 분야 적용가능성을 모색하는 것이다. 개도국 정부가 발전국가모델을 발전전략으로 채택하고 실현하기 위해서 우선 요구되는 것은 정부의 역할이라 할 수 있다. 발전국가론이 요구하는 국가자율성은 정부개입의 정당성을 확보하는 기본이 되며 정책의 투명성과 정치지도자의 도덕적 신념을 바탕으로 형성될 수 있다. 발전국가모델은 정치적 합의와 국민적지지, 정부-기업 간의 협력 네트워크가 없이는 성공하기 힘들다는 것을 한국, 일본, 대만의 사례에서 발견할 수 있었다. 60~70년대 냉전체제 아래에서 추진된 미국의 동북아정책과 같은 역사적 외부환경은 정부 주도의 경제발전 전략을 지지하거나 용인하는 역할을 하였으며 한국, 일본, 대만의 발전국가 전략에 큰 영향을 미친 외부적 역사적 환경임을 발견할 수 있었다.
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=429&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 3
        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 438
            [wr_num] => -438
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 438
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [wr_content] => 

이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1



기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23



라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47



Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71
: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.



목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99
: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로



박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131



임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151



조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177
: 경기도를 중심으로



조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221

            [wr_seo_title] => 지역정책연구-31-2호
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 4476
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => sha256:12000:gCwB5CgWuJst+vAheUqVeRxHMBAkh3aX:88i6aBiBtS2HOSyy1qTZMeluORgCnBYy
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-01-06 14:25:26
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-01-06 14:27:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2020.12.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 16099108683.jpg
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => 지역정책연구 [31-2호]
            [content] => <p>이양수 / 발전국가모델 한국, 일본, 대만의 경제발전 경험이 국제개발협력에 주는 시사점 ···· 1</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><div>기정훈 / 지방 인구구조의 변화와 지역 사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 ·····························23</div><br><br>

<div>라휘문 / 정부 간 행정관계와 차이의 정치 ······································································· 47</div><br><br>

<div>Jeong, Moon-GiㆍHur, SeungUk / Small-and Medium-size Communities and Economic Development ······· 71</div><div>: Focusing on Montgomery County, Virginia in the U.S.A.</div><br><br>

<div>목익수ㆍ최창규ㆍ강우석 / 거대과학시설 인식에 따른 입지저항 및 입지선호에 미치는 영향요인 분석 ·········· 99</div><div>: 포항 4세대 방사광가속기 사례 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>박영원ㆍ류영아 / 공무원 정년연장에 관한 탐색적 연구 ······························································ 131</div><br><br>

<div>임동균ㆍ이재은ㆍ권설아ㆍ이주호 / 의용소방대 역량 강화를 위한 실증 분석 ·························································151</div><br><br>

<div>조성호ㆍ이행준ㆍ조승현 / 자치경찰 분야의 치안 행정수요 분석에 관한 시론적 연구 ································ 177</div><div>: 경기도를 중심으로</div><br><br>

<div>조철주ㆍ원광희 / 충북의 시·군 간 지역격차 변화와 지역격차 영향 요인 분석 ···························· 221</div>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-01-06
            [datetime2] => 01-06
            [last] => 2021-01-06
            [last2] => 01-06
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=438&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 2
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [wr_id] => 442
            [wr_num] => -442
            [wr_reply] => 
            [wr_parent] => 442
            [wr_is_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment] => 0
            [wr_comment_reply] => 
            [ca_name] => 
            [wr_option] => 
            [wr_subject] => [32-1] 아시아, 아메리카, 아프리카 농업유형 비교 : 현대농업 이전에 대한 환경결정론적 해석
            [wr_content] => 

[요약]  


서양 역사에서는 시대를 근세(early modern period), 근대(late modern period), 현대(modern period)로 구분한다. 근세는 대략 16세기 초에 시작된 것으로, 근대는 대략 18세기 중반에 시작된 것으로 여겨진다. 본 연구는 현대농업 이전의 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카의 농업유형을 환경결정론적 시각에서 비교하는 데 목적이 있다. 본 연구에서 현대농업은 제2차 세계대전 이전까지로 본다. 제2차 세계대전 이후 다수의 식민지 국가가 독립하면서, 농촌개발이론과 현대적 의미의 국제개발 협력이 시작되었기 때문이다***. 물론 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카라는 광대한 지역을 하나의 단위로 묶어 비교하는 데에는 한계가 있다. 그래서 이 연구는 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카의 3개 대륙에 대하여, 자연환경 및 사회환경, 작물, 가축의 4개 범주를 비교하였다. 아시아는 자연환경과 사회환경, 작물, 그리고 가축의 측면에서 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 유리하였다. 이러한 이유로 아시아는 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 농업이 빨리 발전할 수 있었다. 즉 아시아가 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 농업이 발전한 것은, 인종의 우월성이 아니라 자연 및 사회적 환경 때문이었다. 또 아시아는 라틴아메리카와 아프리카와 농업유형에서도 차이를 보이고 있다. 이는 국제개발협력을 실시함에 있어서, 아시아, 그리고 아시아의 수도작(rice cultivation) 농경유형에 해당하는 한국의 농업 및 농촌발전 경험을 그대로 원조수원국(recipient country)에 전달하는 것이 가능하지 않다는 것을 의미한다. 즉 라틴아메리카와 아프리카의 원조수원국에 농업에 대하여 국제개발협력을 실시할 경우, 한국과의 차이점을 고려하고 이를 반영하는 것이 필요하다.





            [wr_seo_title] => 32-1-아시아-아메리카-아프리카-농업유형-비교-현대농업
            [wr_link1] => 
            [wr_link2] => 
            [wr_link1_hit] => 0
            [wr_link2_hit] => 0
            [wr_hit] => 1606
            [wr_good] => 0
            [wr_nogood] => 0
            [mb_id] => admin
            [wr_password] => 
            [wr_name] => 관리자
            [wr_email] => admin@domain.com
            [wr_homepage] => 
            [wr_datetime] => 2021-06-02 14:16:45
            [wr_file] => 1
            [wr_last] => 2021-06-02 14:16:45
            [wr_ip] => 203.228.211.131
            [wr_facebook_user] => 
            [wr_twitter_user] => 
            [wr_1] => 
            [wr_2] => 
            [wr_3] => 2021.05.31
            [wr_4] => 
            [wr_5] => 
            [wr_6] => 
            [wr_7] => 
            [wr_8] => 
            [wr_9] => 
            [wr_10] => 
            [wr_11] => 
            [wr_12] => 
            [wr_exp] => 
            [wr_tag] => 
            [is_notice] => 
            [subject] => [32-1] 아시아, 아메리카, 아프리카 농업유형 비교 : 현대농업 이전에 대한 환경결정론적 해석
            [content] => <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" style="" attr_no_border_tbl="1" class="__se_tbl"><tbody>

<tr><td style="width: 1026px; height: 324px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><p><b>[요약]</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>서양 역사에서는 시대를 근세(early modern period), 근대(late modern period), 현대(modern period)로 구분한다. 근세는 대략 16세기 초에 시작된 것으로, 근대는 대략 18세기 중반에 시작된 것으로 여겨진다. 본 연구는 현대농업 이전의 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카의 농업유형을 환경결정론적 시각에서 비교하는 데 목적이 있다. 본 연구에서 현대농업은 제2차 세계대전 이전까지로 본다. 제2차 세계대전 이후 다수의 식민지 국가가 독립하면서, 농촌개발이론과 현대적 의미의 국제개발 협력이 시작되었기 때문이다***. 물론 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카라는 광대한 지역을 하나의 단위로 묶어 비교하는 데에는 한계가 있다. 그래서 이 연구는 아시아, 라틴아메리카, 아프리카의 3개 대륙에 대하여, 자연환경 및 사회환경, 작물, 가축의 4개 범주를 비교하였다. 아시아는 자연환경과 사회환경, 작물, 그리고 가축의 측면에서 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 유리하였다. 이러한 이유로 아시아는 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 농업이 빨리 발전할 수 있었다. 즉 아시아가 라틴아메리카와 아프리카 보다 농업이 발전한 것은, 인종의 우월성이 아니라 자연 및 사회적 환경 때문이었다. 또 아시아는 라틴아메리카와 아프리카와 농업유형에서도 차이를 보이고 있다. 이는 국제개발협력을 실시함에 있어서, 아시아, 그리고 아시아의 수도작(rice cultivation) 농경유형에 해당하는 한국의 농업 및 농촌발전 경험을 그대로 원조수원국(recipient country)에 전달하는 것이 가능하지 않다는 것을 의미한다. 즉 라틴아메리카와 아프리카의 원조수원국에 농업에 대하여 국제개발협력을 실시할 경우, 한국과의 차이점을 고려하고 이를 반영하는 것이 필요하다.</p></td>

</tr>

</tbody>

</table>
            [comment_cnt] => 
            [datetime] => 2021-06-02
            [datetime2] => 06-02
            [last] => 2021-06-02
            [last2] => 06-02
            [name] => 관리자
            [reply] => 0
            [icon_reply] => 
            [icon_link] => 
            [ca_name_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&sca=
            [href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=442&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [comment_href] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=442&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
            [icon_new] => 
            [icon_hot] =>  
            [icon_secret] => 
            [link] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 
                    [2] => 
                )

            [link_href] => Array
                (
                    [1] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=442&no=1&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                    [2] => https://www.cri.re.kr/bbs/link.php?bo_table=010302_1&wr_id=442&no=2&sfl=wr_subject%7C%7Cwr_content&stx=%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%9C%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5&sop=and
                )

            [link_hit] => Array
                (
                    [1] => 0
                    [2] => 0
                )

            [file] => Array
                (
                    [count] => 1
                )

            [icon_file] =>  
            [num] => 1
        )

)
1 [32-1] 아시아, 아메리카, 아프리카 농업유형 비교 : 현대농업 이전에 대한 환경결정론적 해석 관리자 2021.06.02 1,606 파일첨부
“한국연구재단” 등재지로, 지역연구 전문 학술지로 2021년부터 년3회 발간되고 있습니다.

『지역정책연구』는 인적자원개발 및 직업능력개발 관련 전문학술지(한국연구재단 등재학술지)로서 관련 분야의 연구 활성화는 물론 연구결과나 과정 등을 신속하게 전파하여 학술적인 발전에 기여하고 있습니다. 『지역정책연구』에 게재할 우수한 논문을 수시로 공모하오니, 관심 있는 분들의 많은 응모 바랍니다.

  • 논문주제고용, 직업교육·직업훈련, 교육훈련기관 평가, 자격, 진로·직업, 직업교수학습, e-Learning 등
  • 발간일연 3회 (3월 31일, 7월 31일, 11월 30일)
  • 원고마감수시접수
  • 제출방법이메일제출
  • 문의처 Tel. 043)220-1133
원고작성요령 투고지침 연구윤리 논문샘플양식
地域政策硏究(지역정책연구) = Journal of Regional Policies [33-1호]
연구진/발행처 : 충북연구원 발행일 : 2022.05. 보고서번호 : 조회수 : 234

지역정책연구 33권 1호

Journal of Regional Policies Vol. 33 No.1

연구진/발행처

충북연구원

발행일

2022.03.31

원문다운로드 내용보기

이전호 보기

보기
게시물 목록
간행물 정보 제공 - 목차, 서명, 저자, 첨부
목차 서명 저자 첨부
1 가정위탁 청소년의 사회적 지지가 주관적 안녕감에 미치는 영향
: 자기효능감과 회복탄력성의 매개효과 		박은혜
29 농촌지역 사회적경제의 지속가능한 성장과 한계에 대한 인과순환구조 분석 최남희
63 여성폭력 피해 지원정책의 수행도와 중요도에 따른 정책요구도 분석 : 경상북도를 중심으로 배옥현
이미숙
89 지방세 비과세·감면 제도의 실태분석과 개선과제 류영아
113 시민사회 공익활동 지원방안과 중간지원조직의 역할 : 경기도공익활동지원센터를 중심으로 오수길
윤창원
김현
139 고속도로 개통의 지역 내 고용창출효과에 대한 실증분석 홍성효
박고은
155 다문화청소년의 사회적 지지가 학교중단위험에 미치는 영향 : 문화적응스트레스와 우울의 이중매개효과 김선미
181 아프리카 국가들의 국가발전과 경제발전의 장애물 : 민족주의와 부족주의의 충돌 임형백